So in those terms, we felt we were on to something that might be great. But it might have come to a point where your invisible cars were getting a little too superhero-like. And Bond has always gone one way or another way, depending on which actor and which decade, right? The ’80s was very different than the ’60s, and so forth. This was a radical, different thing that we’ve not seen before. The fact that you can mention the word character development in a piece of writing about a Bond film is the reason why this is a great film.Īnd for the guys, there is always the Aston Martin, sexy mobile phones and a truly beautiful Bond girl.It was a double thing. It’s a long film : 2 hours and 24 minutes. Which is for the better, as there is more space for character development. Let’s not forget to mention the always delightful Judi Dench as M.īut don’t expect Moneypenny, Q or loads of gadgets, they are gone. They both have some very characteristic faces, and are very interesting to watch. Jesper Christensen (also a great Danish actor and also playing a baddy) is in it too.ĭaniel Craig has a truly gorgeous body (stop it, now!)īoth Mads Mikkelsen and Daniel Craig are not beautiful in the typical American actor sense of the word.

It’s great to see him in a big film like this.

There are some moments where I was close to crying, yes real drama in a Bond film.ĭaniel Craig is a truly fantastic actor, who is the first to put real character in the Bond character.ĭanish hunk Mads Mikkelsen is as cold as ice as villain Le Chiffre. There are some enormously witty one liners and there surely is humour too.ĭaniel Craig has the world’s most beautiful blue eyes. It’s action from start to finish, but there is space for drama too. This is the first Bond film that is more interesting for women than for men. Daniel Craig is Bond, James Bond in Casino Royale

Mads mikkelsen 007 casino royale